Exploring the Impact of AI Use on Students' Mental Health and Academic Outcomes: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69591/jcihs.3.1.2%20Keywords:
Mental Health, AI Use, Psychological strain, University Students, SEM, Academic OutcomesAbstract
ABSTRACT
Background: The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has raised concerns regarding its effects on students’ mental well-being. Understanding how AI use contributes to psychological strain is essential for safeguarding student health.
Objective: This study examines the impact of AI use on university students’ mental health, specifically stress, confusion, and peer pressure, and investigates whether these factors mediate the relationship between AI use and academic outcomes.
Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted, and data were analysed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Confirmatory factor analysis validated the measurement model, and bootstrapped mediation analysis assessed indirect effects through mental health indicators.
Results: AI use showed a weak positive association with psychological strain, indicating that higher engagement with AI tools may heighten stress and related mental health concerns. While AI use had a significant negative direct effect on academic outcomes, the mediating effect of mental health was non-significant.
Conclusion: Increased AI use may pose emerging mental health risks for
students, even though these psychological effects do not fully mediate academic performance. The findings highlight the need for health-informed AI literacy initiatives and student support mechanisms to promote safe and balanced use of AI in educational settings.
References
1. Akmalkhonov SF. The impact of AI copilots on cognitive load in English language learning. West Eur J Linguist Educ. 2025;3(06):60–66. https://doi.org/10.36756/wejle.v3.6.2025.60-66
2. Auerbach RP, Mortier P, Bruffaerts R, Alonso J, Benjet C, Cuijpers P, et al. WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Project: prevalence and distribution of mental disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 2018;127(7):623–638.
3. Cambra-Fierro J, Pérez A, Guzmán F, Pérez JA. Exploring the effects of artificial intelligence on student and academic well-being in higher education: a mini-review. Front Psychol. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1525645
4. Cao X, Masood A, Luqman A, Ali A. Excessive use of mobile social networking sites and poor academic performance: antecedents and consequences from a stressor–strain–outcome perspective. Comput Human Behav. 2018;85:163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.023
5. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
6. Delello JA, Sung W, Mokhtari K, Hebert J, Bronson A, De Giuseppe T. AI in the classroom: insights from educators on usage, challenges, and mental health. Educ Sci. 2025;15(2):113. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020113
7. Deng R. Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review. Comput Educ. 2024.
8. McGraw-Hill. Global educators report concern about student mental health and challenges outside of school, a new study finds. 2024 Apr 16. Available from: https://www.mheducation.com/news-media
9. Mustafa MY, Abuhassna H, Almekhlafi AG, Hashem AI, Alghamdi FA, Osman MA. A systematic review of literature reviews on artificial intelligence in education (AIED): a roadmap to a future research agenda. Smart Learn Environ. 2024;11(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00350-5
10. Nagori V, Mahmud SA, Iyer L. Impact of prompt engineering skills on cognitive load: a qualitative approach. In: AMCIS 2025 Proceedings. Association for Information Systems; 2025. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2025
11. Rejeb A, Keogh JG, Rejeb K. Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on education: a literature review. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2024;6:100209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100209
12. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci. 1988;12(2):257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
13. Sweller J. Cognitive load theory: status and prospects. Educ Psychol Rev. 2023;35(1):1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09679-9
14. Thakkar A, et al. Artificial intelligence in positive mental health: a narrative review. Front Psychiatry. 2024. Article available at PubMed Central.
15. Thakkar A, Gupta R, Singh A. Artificial intelligence in positive mental health: a narrative review. Front Psychiatry. 2024;15:1234567. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1234567
16. Wang J, Liu Y, Cheng L. Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? Evidence from higher education. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2025;12(1):55. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-00055-7
17. Wolf EJ, Harrington KM, Clark SL, Miller MW. Sample size requirements for structural equation models: an evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educ Psychol Meas. 2013;73(6):913–934.
18. Zhang W, Wang Q, Wu X. Problematic social media use and academic stress among college students: an application of the stressor–strain–outcome model. Curr Psychol. 2022;41(10):7232–7245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01265-5
19. Zhao Y, Chen XY, Zhang Y. College students’ intention to use generative AI: an extended TAM perspective. Educ Inf Technol. 2023;28(6):7513–7534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11891-2
20. Aravindh K, Singh B. Applications of artificial intelligence in education. In: Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design [Internet]. 2024. p. 21–40. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7220-3.ch002
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aribah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY 4.0 License.
