An An Empirical Analysis of ICT Infrastructure and Utilization in Public Sector Universities in Sindh, Pakistan

Authors

  • Anees Muhammad University of Sufism and Modern Sciences, Bhitshah, Pakistan
  • Asif Ali Jamali IICT University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan
  • Shahmurad Chandio IMCS, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan
  • Arifa Bhuto IICT University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan
  • Khali Ur Rehman Khoumbhati IICT University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan
  • Altaf Hussain Abro IMCS, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69591/jcai.3.1.3

Keywords:

ICT Infrastructure, Higher Education, Digital Divide, Public Universities, SDG 4, ICT Utilization

Abstract

ICT is key factor for cultivating higher education quality, fairness, and access. This study assesses ICT infrastructure and student ICT acceptance in universities in Sindh, Pakistan. An investigation of 445 randomly selected students transversely five universities was led, and descriptive statistics were applied to investigate the facts. The outcomes display that elementary ICT services are widely offered (78% report departmental internet access), but progressive resources are wanting. Only 54% of students have access to computer labs, 36% can find particular software, and just 23% have digital library access. Video-conferencing amenities are virtually nonexistent (13%). A majority of students (70%) are familiar with LMS and rate their ICT skills as usual or upstairs, signifying enthusiasm to adopt technology. However, about half of the departments lack campus-wide Wi-Fi, and 65% of students report wanting supplementary training to progress their ICT skills. Over half of students use ICT mainly for education. These results recommend that while universities of Sindh province have made early progress in ICT adoption, significant gaps in infrastructure and support remain. To make ICT's promise of inclusive, high-quality education a reality, we need to fill these gaps. This is in line with Sustainable Development Goal 4.

References

[1] N. Eltaiba, S. Hosseini, and K. Okoye, “Benefits and impact of technology-enhanced learning applications in higher education in Middle East and North Africa: A systematic review,” Glob Transit, vol. 7, pp. 350–374, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2025.06.004.

[2] J. Feng, B. Yu, W. H. Tan, Z. Dai, and Z. Li, “Key factors influencing educational technology adoption in higher education: A systematic review,” PLOS Digital Health, vol. 4, no. 4, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000764.

[3] Z. H. Sahito, F. J. Khoso, and J. Phulpoto, “The Future of Digital Learning in Pakistan: Assessing the Effectiveness of AI-Powered Personalized Learning, Virtual Reality Classrooms, and E-Learning Platforms in Higher Education,” The Regional Tribune, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 87–96, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.63062/trt/wr25.063.

[4] “Goal 4: Quality education - The Global Goals.” Accessed: Oct. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://globalgoals.org/goals/4-quality-education/

[5] S. Asher, “COVID-19, Distance Learning, and the Digital Divide: A Comparative Study of Higher Education Institutions in the US and Pakistan,” International Journal of Multicultural Education, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 112–133, 2021, doi: 10.18251/IJME.V23I3.2921.

[6] B. M. Joshi and S. P. Khatiwada, “Analyzing Barriers to ICT Integration in Education: A Systematic Review,” The Third Pole: Journal of Geography Education, vol. 24, pp. 25–45, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.3126/TTP.V24I1.73325.

[7] S. Jamil and G. Muschert, “The COVID-19 Pandemic and E-Learning: The Digital Divide and Educational Crises in Pakistan’s Universities,” American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 1161–1179, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1177/00027642231156779.

[8] T. Tamim, Z. Khalid, M. Ahmad, M. Chohan, and P. Q. Shah, “Investigation into Rural-Urban Gap in Readiness of Universities for Online Teaching: A Case of Pakistan,” American Journal of Education and Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 118–130, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.54536/AJET.V4I1.3446.

[9] “Exploring ICT-based learning adoption in higher education: An extended perspective of the Technology Acceptance Model | Semantic Scholar.” Accessed: Oct. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/search?q=Exploring%20ICT-based%20learning%20adoption%20in%20higher%20education%3A%20An%20extended%20perspective%20of%20the%20Technology%20Acceptance%20Model&sort=relevance

[10] L. Mumtaz, M. Ali, A. Fatima, and F. Shaikh, “Information Communication Technology (ICT) among University Students in Pakistan,” Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 132–143, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.52131/PJHSS.2023.1101.0335.

[11] N. Eltaiba, S. Hosseini, and K. Okoye, “Benefits and impact of technology-enhanced learning applications in higher education in Middle East and North Africa: A systematic review,” Glob Transit, vol. 7, pp. 350–374, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.GLT.2025.06.004.

[12] B. M. Joshi and S. P. Khatiwada, “Analyzing Barriers to ICT Integration in Education: A Systematic Review,” The Third Pole: Journal of Geography Education, vol. 24, pp. 25–45, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.3126/TTP.V24I1.73325.

[13] N. M. Nhleko, O. J. Aroba, and C. T. Chisita, “A systematic review of information and communication technologies (ICTs) on student motivation: researchers’ reflections on a selected higher education institution (HEIs),” Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 77–100, 2024, doi: 10.1108/GKMC-03-2024-0129.

[14] S. Z. Salas-Pilco, Y. Yang, and Z. Zhang, “Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 593–619, May 2022, doi: 10.1111/BJET.13190.

[15] J. Feng, B. Yu, W. H. Tan, Z. Dai, and Z. Li, “Key factors influencing educational technology adoption in higher education: A systematic review,” PLOS Digital Health, vol. 4, no. 4, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PDIG.0000764.

[16] C. Barra, M. Grimaldi, A. Muazzam, O. Troisi, and A. Visvizi, “Digital divide, gender gap, and entrepreneurial orientation: How to foster technology adoption among Pakistani higher education students?,” Socioecon Plann Sci, vol. 93, p. 101904, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.SEPS.2024.101904.

[17] S. Pardo-Jaramillo, D. Aristizábal-Hernández, P. Cabrera, I. Osuna Soto, and A. Muñoz-Villamizar, “Navigating higher education during COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of NPS and customer experience in technological adoption,” Humanit Soc Sci Commun, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1057/S41599-025-05474-8;SUBJMETA.

[18] M. M. Asad, N. Hussain, M. Wadho, Z. H. Khand, and P. P. Churi, “Integration of e-learning technologies for interactive teaching and learning process: an empirical study on higher education institutes of Pakistan,” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 649–663, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1108/JARHE-04-2020-0103.

[19] SHAHMURAD CHANDIO, “A MODEL OF ICT ACCEPTANCE BY ACADEMICS: A CASE IN SINDH PROVINCE, PAKISTAN,” 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.minsal.cl/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2019.01.23_PLAN-NACIONAL-DE-CANCER_web.pdf

[20] S. Maqbool et al., “Student’s perception of E-learning during COVID-19 pandemic and its positive and negative learning outcomes among medical students: A country-wise study conducted in Pakistan and Iran,” Ann Med Surg (Lond), vol. 82, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.AMSU.2022.104713.

[21] “View of COVID-19, Distance Learning, and the Digital Divide: A Comparative Study of Higher Education Institutions in the US and Pakistan.” Accessed: Oct. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ijme-journal.org/index.php/ijme/article/view/2921/1555?utm_source=chatgpt.com

[22] M. Ishtiaq, “Book Review Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,” English Language Teaching, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 40, 2019, doi: 10.5539/elt.v12n5p40.

[23] “Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS 12 and 13: A Guide for Social Scientists - Alan Bryman, Duncan Cramer - Google Books.” [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com.pk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GHMgxwYHbREC&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&dq=Bryman,+A.+and+Cramer,+D.+(2005),+Quantitative+Data+Analysis+with+SPSS+12+and++13:+A+guide+for+social+scientists,+East+Sussex:+Routledge.&ots=ldttlRYD1J&sig=JSuDxIDgdNgpsIyqbNsDQRHmk1c&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

[24] E. Bell and A. Bryman, “The ethics of management research: An exploratory content analysis,” British Journal of Management, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 63–77, 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00487.x.

[25] J. Pallant, SPSS Survival Manual, 6th edition, 2016. Open University Press, 2016.

Additional Files

Published

2025-06-15

Issue

Section

Articles